Monday, June 2, 2014

FINAL DAY!

Lab Day 12
Today we figured out what our unknown bacteria is. After taking all of our test results and using flow charts we discovered that our bacteria is E. coli.














Our flow chart consisted of the flowing steps:
Gram-negative rod-shaped ID flowchart
Oxidase Test—Negative
Lactose Test—Positive
Indole Test—Positive
Citrate Test—Negative

    E. coli.








Joanna Dawyot, Cassie Livingston, Mary Rose Capara 
 

DisclaimerAll content provided on this blog is representation of the blog owner and not FranciscanUniversity of Steubenville. The information on this site is purely used for education purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Privacy The owner of this blog does not share personal information with third-parties nor does the owner store information is collected about your visit for use other than to analyze content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet
 browser’s settings. The owner is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this
 blog on other Web sites or media without permission.Blog CommentsThe owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to;1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam2. Comments including profanity3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive4. Comments that attack a person individuallyThis policy is subject to change at anytime.

Lab Day 11

Lab Day 11

We looked at the results from the Steph. Blood Agar Plate incubated with the Bacitracin, which showed a positive for Strep. There was beta-hemolysis and it was sensitive to the Bacitracin.


Next we looked at our unknown sample tested with the neosporin:
The neomycin was effective on our bacteria, which agrees with the data taken from the penicillin test.







Next we completed an ELISA test on given samples to see how we test for antigens
  This test is used to detect antibodies in the blood. This test is often used to see if you have been exposed to viruses or other substances that cause infection. It is often used to screen for current or past infections. 
The bottom of each well is coated with a protein to which will bind the antibody you want to measure. Whole blood is allowed to clot and the cells are centrifuged out to obtain the clear serum with antibodies (called primary antibodies). The serum is incubated in a well, and each well contains a different serum (see figure below). A positive control serum and a negative control serum would be included among the 96 samples being tested.


After some time, the serum is removed and weakly adherent antibodies are washed off with a series of buffer rinses. To detect the bound antibodies, a secondary antibody is added to each well. The secondary antibody would bind to all human antibodies and is typically produced in a rodent. Attached to the secondary antibody is an enzyme such as peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase. These enzymes can metabolize colorless substrates (sometimes called chromagens) into colored products. After an incubation period, the secondary antibody solution is removed and loosely adherent ones are washed off as before. The final step is the addition the enzyme substrate and the production of colored product in wells with secondary antibodies bound.

Then we looked at our results for both of the Agar Disk Diffusion Assay.

 The reaction reacts and makes precipitate- anti bovine album.









Finally we placed samples from all of our bacteria into a beaker of distilled water. Then to test a way of killing bacteria we used UV light to purify the water.












Joanna Dawyot, Cassie Livingston, Mary Rose Capara 
 

DisclaimerAll content provided on this blog is representation of the blog owner and not FranciscanUniversity of Steubenville. The information on this site is purely used for education purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Privacy The owner of this blog does not share personal information with third-parties nor does the owner store information is collected about your visit for use other than to analyze content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet
 browser’s settings. The owner is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this
 blog on other Web sites or media without permission.Blog CommentsThe owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to;1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam2. Comments including profanity3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive4. Comments that attack a person individuallyThis policy is subject to change at anytime.

Friday, May 30, 2014

Day 10

Lab Day 10

We checked our results from the day before, our lab group samples.


Nasal Swab on the Mannitol Salt Plate:
There was growth on the plate however, there was no yellow coloration on the plate. Therefore there was no MRSA present in the sample.

Throat Swab on the Blood Agar Plate:
There was beta-hemolysis on the blood agar plate, meaning that there was Staphylococcus present. However, we placed a bacitracin tablet on the plate to check if it is Group A or Group B Staph.

Urine Sample on the EMB Plate:
There was no growth on the plate therefore there is no E. coli in the the sample that we collected.


Then we wanted to check to see if our bacteria was resistant or non resistant to specific antibiotics.
We placed 5 tablets into a plate of our specimen:
P: 7mm in diameter,
Neomycin: 15mm in diameter, intermediate
Cinnamon Oil: 25 mm
Tetracycline: 20mm very sensitive to Pro sysnthesis
Augmentin: 23mm very affective
Lemon Oil: didn't wok at all


Real Time PCR- sero conversion- present antibodies against antigens

We completed an Antibody-Antigen Reaction in Agar exercise, and we Tested for Food Purity.





Joanna Dawyot, Cassie Livingston, Mary Rose Capara 
 

DisclaimerAll content provided on this blog is representation of the blog owner and not FranciscanUniversity of Steubenville. The information on this site is purely used for education purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Privacy The owner of this blog does not share personal information with third-parties nor does the owner store information is collected about your visit for use other than to analyze content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet
 browser’s settings. The owner is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this
 blog on other Web sites or media without permission.Blog CommentsThe owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to;1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam2. Comments including profanity3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive4. Comments that attack a person individuallyThis policy is subject to change at anytime.

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Lab Day 9

Lab Day 9
Today we took a series of samples from members of our group.

Nasal Swab: For this test we took a swab sample, using aseptic technique, and smeared the sample on a Mannitol-Salt plate because we are testing for MRSA/staph. When taking the sample we needed to use a saline solution, because the area being tested is not moist, and then rotated the swab 2-5 times counterclockwise and clockwise.



Throat Swab: For this test we also swabbed the back of the throat using aseptic technique. In this test we are testing for strep, therefore we swabbed the sample on a Blood Agar plate.



Urine Swab: For this test, a member in our group preformed a urine test. We then placed some of the urine on a EMB plate, because in this type of test we are testing for E. coli we use either an EMB or MacConkey plate, and used a sterilized loop.


After we preformed these tests we placed these plates in the incubator and we shall observe our results tomorrow.
Next we started our Antibiotic Sensitivity Test. We spread our unknown bacteria onto a new nurtient agar plate. Then we added several antibiotics onto the plate. We sterilized tweezers using 95% ethanol.
Antibiotics


      1.  Neomycin
      2. Tetracytine
      3. Penicillin
      4. Lemon Oil
      5. Cinnamon Oil
      6. Agumented














Tomorrow we shall see how our bacteria reacts to specific antibiotics.











Joanna Dawyot, Cassie Livingston, Mary Rose Capara 

DisclaimerAll content provided on this blog is representation of the blog owner and not FranciscanUniversity of Steubenville. The information on this site is purely used for education purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Privacy The owner of this blog does not share personal information with third-parties nor does the owner store information is collected about your visit for use other than to analyze content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet
 browser’s settings. The owner is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this
 blog on other Web sites or media without permission.Blog CommentsThe owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to;1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam2. Comments including profanity3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive4. Comments that attack a person individuallyThis policy is subject to change at anytime.

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Lab Day 8

Lab Day 8
Today in lab, we observed our results from the tests we did the day before.
MacConkey Agar: the results of this test was that the strand of bacteria turned a bright pink color meaning it was a positive test. Our bacteria is a lactose fermenter.



Eosin Methylene Blue Agar (EMB): The strain of our bacteria was a green color meaning our bacteria was a strong lactose fermenter. If it was pink color, it would mean our bacteria was a weak lactose fermenter.



Mannitol Salt Agar: This test tests for staphylococcus which means only halophiles would appear positive and the color would turn yellow. Our bacteria was negative for halophiles therefore it is not staphylococcus and our bacteria does not ferment mannitol.













Phenylethyl Alcohol Agar (PEA): Our bacteria is gram negative therefore, it won’t grow on the PEA agar.










Blood Agar: The result of our test was that the bacteria turned green which means it was alpha-hemolitis. This means our bacteria was partial hemolysis and you can use this test to test for strep.





Joanna Dawyot, Cassie Livingston, Mary Rose Capara 

DisclaimerAll content provided on this blog is representation of the blog owner and not FranciscanUniversity of Steubenville. The information on this site is purely used for education purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Privacy The owner of this blog does not share personal information with third-parties nor does the owner store information is collected about your visit for use other than to analyze content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet
 browser’s settings. The owner is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this
 blog on other Web sites or media without permission.Blog CommentsThe owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to;1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam2. Comments including profanity3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive4. Comments that attack a person individuallyThis policy is subject to change at anytime.



Thursday, May 22, 2014

Lab Day 7
May 22


Part 1 of today's lab: checking our experimental results from yesterday

1: Indole (Tryptophan Degradation) Test
Purpose: to determine the ability of some bacteria to split the amino acid trypotphan into indole and pyruvic acid.
Result: positive
We added 15 drops of Kovac's reagent. A red layer formed on the top of our sample and this indicates a positive test for the presence of indole. This means that Trypotphan was hydrolyzed.




2: Urea Hydrolysis Test
Purpose: to determine the ability of a bacterium to hydrolyze a urea.
Result: Negative
A few bacteria use the enzyme urease to rapidly degrade urea into CO2 and Ammonia. The color didn't change from from the original color and this signified a negative test. If ammonia was produced, the color would've been pink in alkaline ph due to the breaking down of urea with the urease enzyme.




3: Citrate Utilization Test
Purpose: to determine if bacterium can utilize citrate as its sole source of carbon and energy.
Result: negative
The ph indicator bromothymol blue turns blue in alkaline ph. A change in color of the medium from green to blue denotes a positive test. Our color did not change and therefore, our bacteria didn't have the enzyme to break down citric acid.

4: Nitrate Reduction Test
Purpose: to determine if a bacterium is able to reduce nitrate ions to either nitrite ions or to nitrogen gas.
Result: positive
Nitrate accepts electrons instead of oxygen. We were looking for a nitrate reduction enzyme.
This test can be two part:
Nitrate ----> nitrate
Nitrite ---> ammonia
However, because our test was positive for nitrites upon adding Sulfanilic Acid and Dimethyl-alpha-naphthylamine, we did not have to test further in case our bacterial nitrate broth had undergone both reactions and turned into ammonia. It turned a cherry red which signifies that it produced nitrites and is therefore positive.
5: MR-VP
Purpose: to determine the ability of some bacteria to ferment glucose via mixed-acid fermentation.
MR result: positive – VP result: negative
If our MR-VP broth used glucose and fermented it for acid, upon adding methyl red (a ph indicator), you should see a color change to red. Ours reacted this way when it was added. VP test tests butanediol for non-acidic end product but if MR test is positive, VP is negative.








6: Litmus Milk Reactions
Purpose: to differentiate among bacteria as to their ability to utilize lactose, protein, and litmus in litmus milk.
Results: The curds that were present yesterday, were even more of a pink color today. The pink color signifies that our bacteria can ferment lactose. The cracks in the curds signify the presence of gas.
When testing for acidic and non-acidic curds, we turned the tube upside down. If they were to come down, it would be non-acid curd but being that our curds remained immotile when turned, we can tell that our bacteria form an acid curd in litmus milk.

Part 2 of todays lab: Selective and Differential Plates

The procedures for each of these tests were the same. Practicing aseptic technique throughout, we inoculated each of the following plates.

1: MacConkey Agar
Purpose: to detect and differentiate among gram-negative enteric bacilli, based on their ability to grow on the medium and to ferment lactose.
2: Eosin Methylene Blue Agar
Purpose: To isolate and differentiate gram-negative enteric bacilli.

3: Phenylethyl Alcohol Agar
Purpose: To isolate gram-positive bacteria from a specimen containing a mixture of gram-positive and -negative bacteria

4: Blood Agar Plate
Purpose: 1. To isolate and support the growth of fastidious bacteria. 2. To differentiate among bacteria based on their ability to lyse red blood cells.

5: Mannitol Salt Agar
Purpose: to isolate bacteria based on their salt tolerance and differentiate among these isolates for mannitol fermentation.

After inoculating each of these plates, we placed them in an incubator set at 37 degrees Celsius. 









Joanna Dawyot, Cassie Livingston, Mary Rose Capara 

DisclaimerAll content provided on this blog is representation of the blog owner and not FranciscanUniversity of Steubenville. The information on this site is purely used for education purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Privacy The owner of this blog does not share personal information with third-parties nor does the owner store information is collected about your visit for use other than to analyze content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet
 browser’s settings. The owner is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this
 blog on other Web sites or media without permission.Blog CommentsThe owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to;1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam2. Comments including profanity3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive4. Comments that attack a person individuallyThis policy is subject to change at anytime.











Lab Day 6
Part 1-Observations
Today in our lab we observed the results from the food tests that we did the day before. Our results are going to help us figure out what our unknown sample of bacteria is.

We also looked at our virus test that we did yesterday. Our "Europe" did not turn out very well. The other group's "Awkward", however, turned out very well. 

The first test we checked is the starch plate. A positive test would show a halo on the plate around the bacteria. This halo did not show up on our plate, therefore our bacteria had a negative starch test. We used Gram's Iodine to check to see the halo. 












The next test was the skim milk test, which tested caesin. This was a negative result for us. Dr. P told us to incubate the plate longer. We shall see more results tomorrow.



The lipid, fat, plate was the next plate we observed. There is clear zones due to break down of the lipids. This test was negative for us.

A positive DNA plate when loaded with N. HCL will show a dark halo. Our plate did not show a dark halo when the solution was added, therefore our DNAase test was negative.

The next set of tests we observed were found in the tubes.
Sucrose Test: negative
Litmus Milk: lactic acid curds milk, pink hue, cracks in the curd meaning that there was gas produced. We had a positive test result, however, Dr. P told us to re-incubate.
Maltose: positive












Glucose: positive. There was color change
Lactose: positive. Change in the color


Triple Sugar IA: positive. Both the slant and the butt showed a yellow color which meant that glucose, lactose, and/or sucrose were fermented. Meaning that the slant and the butt were acidic.

Part 2-Tests
The next part of the lab that we did was complete more tests on our bacteria.

Oxidase Test: to determine if our bacteria has cytochrome oxidase a participate in electron transport chain during respiration.
We took the lid of our bacteria plate placed filter paper on it. Then we squeezed two drops of oxidase reagent and then we added the bacteria. The bacteria turned yellow not purple on contact with the reagent, therefore, the results were negative.
The next set of test that we did are going to set overnight to incubate.
We inoculated 5 different tests.
Urea
Citrate
Nitrate
MR-UP
Protein Indole



Today during lab we noticed that Dr. P had a cut on his hand. He showed us a cool way to decrease the bleeding of his cut. He took a piece of chalk and crushed it and the placed the chalk on the cut. This because there is calcium in the chalk the coagulation increased.







Joanna Dawyot, Cassie Livingston, Mary Rose Capara 

DisclaimerAll content provided on this blog is representation of the blog owner and not FranciscanUniversity of Steubenville. The information on this site is purely used for education purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. Privacy The owner of this blog does not share personal information with third-parties nor does the owner store information is collected about your visit for use other than to analyze content performance through the use of cookies, which you can turn off at anytime by modifying your Internet
 browser’s settings. The owner is not responsible for the republishing of the content found on this
 blog on other Web sites or media without permission.Blog CommentsThe owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice due to;1. Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam2. Comments including profanity3. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive4. Comments that attack a person individuallyThis policy is subject to change at anytime.